@article {213, title = {Auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation acutely modulates brain connectivity in mice}, journal = {Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience}, volume = {16}, year = {2022}, pages = {856855}, chapter = {856855}, doi = {10.3389/fncel.2022.856855}, url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2022.856855/abstract}, author = {Cecilia Brambilla-Pisoni and Emma Mu{\~n}oz-Moreno and Ianire Gallego-Amaro and Rafael Maldonado and Antoni Ivorra and Guadalupe Soria and Andr{\'e}s Ozaita} } @article {184, title = {Auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improves memory persistence in na{\"\i}ve mice and in an intellectual disability mouse model}, journal = {Brain Stimulation}, volume = {13}, year = {2020}, pages = {494-498}, chapter = {494}, doi = {10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.024}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.024}, author = {Anna V{\'a}zquez-Oliver and Cecilia Brambilla-Pisoni and Mikel Domingo-Gainza and Rafael Maldonado and Antoni Ivorra and Andr{\'e}s Ozaita} } @article {169, title = {Avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in liver irreversible electroporation using radiofrequency electric fields}, journal = {Physics in Medicine and Biology}, volume = {63}, year = {2018}, pages = {035027}, chapter = {035027}, doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/aaa16f}, author = {Q. Castellv{\'\i} and Borja Mercadal and Xavier Moll and Fontdevila, Dolors and Andaluz, Anna and Antoni Ivorra} } @article {153, title = {Anatomically Realistic Simulations of Liver Ablation by Irreversible Electroporation: Impact of Blood Vessels on Ablation Volumes and Undertreatment}, journal = {Technology in Cancer Research \& Treatment}, volume = {[Epub ahead of print]}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1177/1533034616687477}, author = {Radwan Qasrawi and Louis Silve and Fernando Burd{\'\i}o and Ziad Abdeen and Antoni Ivorra} } @article {165, title = {Avoiding nerve stimulation in irreversible electroporation: a numerical modeling study}, journal = {Physics in Medicine and Biology}, volume = {62}, year = {2017}, pages = {8060-8079}, chapter = {8060}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa8c53}, author = {Borja Mercadal and Christopher Arena and Rafael Davalos and Antoni Ivorra} } @inbook {155, title = {Assessment of Electroporation by Electrical Impedance Methods}, booktitle = {Handbook of Electroporation}, year = {2016}, pages = {1-20 (electronic)}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, organization = {Springer International Publishing}, abstract = {

Electroporation causes an immediate increase in cell membrane permeability that results in membrane conductivity increase, which has an effect in the measured impedance of the cell suspension or the tissue. Therefore, impedance measurements offer the possibility to perform real-time assessment of the electroporation phenomenon in a minimally invasive fashion. Nevertheless, impedance measurements in biological organisms depend on many factors and other processes besides the membrane permeabilization. This lack of specificity can be an important drawback for using impedance measurements as an electroporation measure. An equivalent electrical model of cell suspensions and tissues is commonly employed to better understand how the different processes that take place during electroporation can affect the measured impedance of a sample. This chapter briefly overviews the information that can be extracted from impedance measurements during and after the application of electroporation pulses. These measurements have been widely used to observe and analyze the dynamics of the phenomenon. Impedance has the potential to be used as a tool to assess electroporation effectiveness of treatment. A significant conclusion from the experimental studies on the topic is that conductivity measured shortly after treatment appears to be correlated with electroporation effectiveness in terms of cell membrane permeabilization. That is, it has the potential to be used as an electroporation effectiveness indicator. On the other hand, dynamic conductivity during the electroporation pulses, which is much easier to be measured, does not seem to be correlated with electroporation effectiveness.

}, issn = {978-3-319-26779-1}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-26779-1_164-1}, author = {Q. Castellv{\'\i} and Borja Mercadal and Antoni Ivorra} }